NOW LOOK HERE in Volkskrant
Jan 29, 2020
1 min read
My current exhibition NOW LOOK HERE appeared in the Dutch newspaper Volkskrant yesterday.
Read the full article here.
top of page
bottom of page
My current exhibition NOW LOOK HERE appeared in the Dutch newspaper Volkskrant yesterday.
Read the full article here.
A Jan 29, 2020 folder stamp only works if the Volkskrant listing and review actually shared a day. Archivists and small-press librarians sorting exhibition clippings hit the same fork: keep both dates or pick one. Before scanning, run the pages through an image-DPI converter so the deliberate marks in NOW LOOK HERE survive compression instead of turning into artifacts.
Sharing a few tools I keep coming back to: Palworld Breeding Calculator has been genuinely useful, Dota 2 Tools has been genuinely useful, Domake AI has been genuinely useful, Random Atlas has been genuinely useful, Dota 2 Counter Pick has been genuinely useful, Audio Visualizer has been genuinely useful, and Remove Objects has been genuinely useful.
Reading that the exhibition got covered in Volkskrant is really cool. Printed press still gives a show weight, kind of like free browser games give quick fun.
If the listing and the review landed on different days, which one owns the Jan 29, 2020 folder stamp? And when two dates disagree, do the deliberate marks in NOW LOOK HERE get reassigned to whichever clipping you trust, or do you keep both versions side by side in a press coverage archive for exhibitions? I’d still want to know how the Volkskrant run was actually published.
Jan 29, 2020 as a folder name still assumes the Volkskrant run had one clean publication date — did it, or did the listing and the review land on different days? I'd want a calculator for dating exhibition press clippings rather than trusting screenshots. What happens when two dates disagree and the marks you called deliberate sit in both?